... II. The petition to review the conformity of the Treaty on the European Union (referred to as the Treaty of Maastricht by the petitioner) as a whole, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (referred to as the Treaty of Rome by the petitioner) as a whole with the constitutional order is rejected [as inadmissible for being out of scope of the jurisdiction of the Court The petition to review the conformity of Art. 2, Art. 4 and Art. 216 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is rejected [as inadmissible for being res iudicata The judge rapporteur stated in the reasoning of the judgment: “However, that does not mean that potential subsequent petitioners (or potential parties to other proceedings) may contest, over and over again, conclusions concerning an international treaty’s conformity with the constitutional order that the Constitutional Court has already stated in a judgment,” The Constitutional Court em... ...
... Any of these measures regarding end-user’s access to or use of
services and applications through electronic communications networks
liable to restrict those fundamental rights or freedoms may only be
imposed if they are appropriate, proportionate and necessary within a
democratic society, and their implementation shall be subject to
adequate procedural safeguards in conformity with the Euro... A prior, fair and impartial
procedure shall be guaranteed, including the right to be heard of the
person or persons concerned, subject to the need for appropriate
conditions and procedural arrangements in duly substantiated cases of
urgency in conformity with European Convention for the Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. ...