Inicio > Resultados
Búsqueda:
Court
Memoria del año 2011 del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Annual Report 2011 of European Court of Human Rights.
... Esta disponible la Memoria Anual correspondiente a 2011 del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos . En ella se incluye, entre otras cosas, un resumen de los casos resueltos y un breve comentario sobre el objeto y contenido de cada uno de los derechos garantizados. Me gusta: Me gusta Sé el primero en decir que te gusta esta post. ...
Reglamento Bruselas I: ¿El “Imperio” contraataca?
... De una parte, los apartados 127 a 129 de la sentencia de la Court of Appeal de 16 de diciembre de 2009 en el asunto Lucasfilm Ltd v. Andrew Ainsworth :
“127. So Owusu establishes where Art. 2 confers personal jurisdiction in a court of a Member State by reason of the defendant’s domicile in that State, the court cannot refuse to hear the case because there is a more appropriate forum abroad. It does not begin to address a quite different question, namely given personal jurisdiction, is the subject-matter jurisdiction of the court also displaced by Art. 2?
128. Thus it provides for all the consequences of its allocation of jurisdiction rules - exclusive jurisdiction for court first seised, a lis alibi pendens rule in other courts, mutual recognition of judgments and so on. En síntesis, la interpretación sobre este particular de la Court of Appeal es insostenible a la luz de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia. ...
The Civil Court of the City New York
... The Civil Court of the City New York (El tribunal Civil de la Ciudad de Nueva York) cuenta con una magnifica página Web en la que facilita información legal a los ciudadanos, traducida, nada menos, que en cinco idiomas, entre ellos, el español. The Civil Court of the City New York.- El tribunal Civil de la Ciudad de Nueva York tiene jurisdicción sobre casos civiles cuyo valor monetario no sobrepasa los $25,000, así como sobre otros asuntos civiles que hayan sido remitidos por el Tribunal Supremo. ...
TEDH: STEFANICA Y OTROS V. RUMANIA
... The Court is master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case and is not bound by the characterisation given by an applicant or a government. The Court notes that the present case concerns a legal question affecting former employees of B. who were part of the same collective dismissal process. The Court considers it necessary to analyse further the Government's argument that there was a mechanism in place to ensure a uniform interpretation of the applicable law. Moreover, the Court reiterates its conclusion in the case of Tudor Tudor (cited above) that where the intervention of the Supreme Court was only possible by means of an extraordinary appeal that contradicted in itself the principle of legal certainty. The Court acknowledges that a lower court's appreciation of the facts of a case and its assessment of the evidence therein, may lead to different outcomes for parties with broadly similar grievances. ...
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (5.10.2010) - Reglamento Bruselas II, derechos de custodia y padres no casados
... On 15 July 2009 the father’s lawyers prepared, on his instructions, an application to initiate proceedings before the Irish court with jurisdiction, namely the District Court, in order to obtain rights of custody in respect of his three children. At that date, the abovementioned application had not been served on the mother, with the result that, in accordance with Irish procedural law, the action had not been validly brought and the Irish court had therefore not been seised. The father brought an appeal against that decision before the referring court. In its reference for a preliminary ruling, that court states that on 25 July 2009 the father had no rights of custody, within the meaning of the provisions of the 1980 Hague Convention, in respect of his children. However, the court accepts that the interpretation of those provisions of European Union law falls within the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice." ...
Magnífico artículo sobre la Libertad de Expresión y el Anonimato
... D. & C.4th 328 (2004), the court held that the right to speak anonymously on the Internet is protected by the First Amendment. The Court holding says: “The First Amendment is not intended to protect unconditionally all forms of expression. The Court granted the recipient”s request and ordered the ISP to provide the identity of the anonymous (an annoying) Internet speaker. In Polito v. AOL, the Court had to balance the scope of the anonymous Internet speaker constitutional freedom of speech and privacy rights v. the recipient’s rights. The court refused to order the ISP to reveal the identity of the anonymous Internet speakers. The court was concerned with the freedom of speech of those anonymous Internet speakers who were not parties to the underlying litigation. ...
El Tribunal Supremo británico y el deber de diligencia
... Uno de ellos es el titulado The UK Supreme Court que, como su propio título señala, está orientado al seguimiento de la actividad del Tribunal Supremo de Gran Bretaña, una institución de joven historia pero que enlaza con la más clásica tradición británica como indica la presentación del blog:
“This blog is dedicated to the UK Supreme Court. The UK Supreme Court is the UK's highest court; its judgments bind lower courts and thus shape the development of English Law. Since 1399, the Law Lords, the judges of the most senior court in the country, have sat within Parliament. From October 2009, however, they have moved to an independent court in the Middlesex Guildhall. To mark this historic development, this blog has been set up to provide commentary on the UK Supreme Court and its judgments”. ...
Resolución final del caso Sharemula. La Audiencia de Madrid es rotunda: las webs de enlaces a redes P2P no son delito. (Actualización)
... The first resolution that declared criminal non-liability for these webssites in Spain was resolved by a court in Barcelona in july 2003, analyzing ajoderse.com website case. It was followed by a sentence dated 22nd December 2005 by the Provincial Court of Barcelona that stated a not guilty resolution for todocaratulas.es website. Promusicae President, Mr. Guisasola, in newspaper declarations last 19th September to El País, has mentioned their will to appeal the resolution in civil jurisdiction, which is not appropriate as the Provincial Court of Madrid resolution is firm. The last Provincial Court resolution does not enter into argumentations about commercial use of the websites. ...
Update on: links to P2P downloads confirmed Legal in Spain
... The first resolution that declared criminal non-liability for these websites in Spain was resolved by a court in Barcelona in july 2003, analyzing ajoderse.com website case. It was followed by a sentence dated 22nd December 2005 by the Provincial Court of Barcelona that stated a not guilty resolution for todocaratulas.es website. Promusicae President, Mr. Guisasola, in newspaper declarations last 19th September to El País, has mentioned their will to appeal the resolution in civil jurisdiction, which is not appropriate as the Provincial Court of Madrid resolution is firm. The last Provincial Court resolution does not enter into argumentations about commercial use of the websites. ...
Cyberlaw: No hay "uso lícito" de la obra de Rowling
... Amount and Substantiality of the Use: The court conceded that in order for the Lexicon "[t]o fulfill its purpose as a reference guide to the Harry Potter works, it is reasonably necessary for the Lexicon to make considerable use of the original works." However, the court concluded that the Lexicon’s "verbatim copying and close paraphrasing" of language from Rowling's works weigh heavily against it on this factor, explaining that the "phrases [taken] are, as Rowling testified, the 'plums in [her] cake. In any event, the court held that the Lexicon could harm sales of Rowling's two companion books, Quidditch Through the Ages and Fantastic Beasts & Where to Find Them, and in view of this market harm, the fourth factor tips in favor of the plaintiffs. ...
Afinar búsqueda
Materias relacionadas
Envíanos tu opinión: info@legalsolo.com
legalsolo.com es un servicio desarrollado por DRELEX Legal Systems s.l. © 2011
Powered by Colbenson