... The question of synchronization with respect to Brussels I, Rome I and Rome II needs to be resolved on the level of interpretation. With respect to the predecessors of these regulations, the European Court of Justice had similarly resorted to an interpretation correlation. Besides the autonomous interpretation of the respective regulation on the vertical interpretation axis, the concordance imperatives of the recitals in the Rome I and Rome II Regulation have to be considered (on the horizontal interpretation axis). These must be taken into account in the course of a purposive interpretation, and they argue against relativity of the respective legal terms and for a consistent interpretation beyond the limits of each regulation. Between the Regulations there is an interpretation correlation; all three instruments of European private international law and procedural law must be seen and interpreted as a single mutually connected entity (coherence of interpretation). ...
... Without deeming it appropriate to pronounce as to what the actual outcome of the applicants' lawsuit should have been (see mutatis mutandis, Vinčić and Others v. Serbia , no. 44698/06 et seq. § 56, 1 December 2009), the Court considers that this diversity of interpretation of national law by the different county courts ruling as final instances led to judicial uncertainty in the adjudicati... The Court considers it necessary to analyse further the Government's argument that there was a mechanism in place to ensure a uniform interpretation of the applicable law. ...
... Courts are not arbiters of scriptural interpretation", frase lapidaria del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica en la sentencia Thomas v. Review Board , 450 U.S. 707. ...